R I T I C I S M . O M :: Home Media Criticism future |
On the Wire | Forecast
The Future of American Newspapers: A Forecast Written in 1991 By Steve Hoenisch Last updated on June 22, 2007 Copyright 1996-2006 www.Criticism.Com Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION 2 READERSHIP 2.1 Age 2.2 Teenagers Today, Newspaper Readers Tomorrow 2.3 Level of literacy 2.4 Family Composition And Newspaper Readership 2.5 Newspaper Image 2.6 Decreases in Leisure Time 2.7 Political Apathy and Readership 2.8 The Readership Forecast 2.9 Alternate Readership Forecast: The Renaissance 2.10 Another Possibility: The Mass-Media Rebellion 3 TECHNOLOGY 3.1 Personal Computers and Pagination 3.2 The Talking Newspaper 3.3 The Facsimile Newspaper 3.4 The Telecommunication-Newspaper Forecast 3.5 The Electronic Newspaper 3.6 Electronic Data Bases 3.7 Other Technology 4 CONTENT 4.1 Newspaper Design 4.2 Editorial Content 5 OTHER FORMS, OTHER FORMATS 5.1 Multimedia News 6 CONCLUSION 7 NOTES 8 RELATED 1 INTRODUCTION
Note: This forecast was written in spring 1991 for a course at the University of Hartford.
Newspapers have been published in America
for more
than 286 years. The Boston News-Letter, the first paper to
publish
continuously, began in April 1704 -- 87 years before the U.S.
Constitution
was signed in 1787. The Hartford Courant, the oldest continuously
published
newspaper in the United States, was established in 1764. It's
still going
strong.
But few days pass without hearing people herald the coming
extinction
of daily newspapers: An industry in decline, they say, a limping
dinosaur.
Nobody reads newspapers anymore, these people say. Who has
time for
that? Others respond by saying you can watch the news on TV while
sitting
on your couch. Why bother putting out all that effort to read?
And hey,
broadcast news is exciting and entertaining; newspapers aren't.
Remarks such as these are heard mostly among the young; many
older people
are perfectly content to read their morning paper, although they
are less
apt to read an afternoon paper than 20 years ago.1
But it is the young of today who are the newspaper readers of
tomorrow.
The future of newspapers depends on them. Without readers, there
would
not be advertisers. Without advertisers, there would not be money
to pay
journalists to gather news, money to buy newsprint, or money to
buy presses
and pay for printing. Without readers, newspapers would cease to
be published.
Because the future of newspapers hinges on a healthy readership,
a model
that attempts to forecast the form and content of newspapers in
the year
2010 must determine whether it is reasonable to expect that there
will
be readers, and if so, who will they be and how many will they
number?
If there are readers, will there be advertisers?
Another major factor that will shape the newspapers of the
future is
advances in computer and communication technology.
Likely changes in newspaper readership and developments in
technology,
then, must be considered in order to forecast the editorial
content and
design of daily newspapers in 2010.
2 READERSHIPOf the many factors that will play a role in how newspapers
look and
feel by the year 2010, one of the most important is readership.
The makeup
and content of newspapers will depend in part on the preferences
and demands
of the reading public -- or at least on how editors and
publishers perceive
those preferences.
Several factors affect newspaper readership:
*Age.
*Educational and literacy levels.
*Income and occupation.
*Household composition.
*Geographical trends in housing: Whether the majority of the
American population
chooses to live in the suburbs or in the city.
*Leisure time, especially the amount of time people can devote to
reading.
*Competition from other media.
Of these variables, one of the most important for forecasting
newspaper
readership is age.
2.1 AgeAge, as E.W. Brody points out in Communication Tomorrow: New
Audiences,
New Technologies, New Media, is an important determinant of
informational
need. The group with the most newspaper readers lies roughly
between the
ages of 35 and 65, with readership lower among those younger than
35 and
tailing off for those older than 65.
Those in the age group between 35 and 44 have traditionally
had the
highest level of readership. But despite slight increases in
overall newspaper
circulation, which can be attributed at least in part to the
aging baby-boom
generation of the post-World War II years, the percentage of
newspaper
readers in the 35 to 65 age group decreased by a rate of 17
percent between
1967 and 1987.2
A more alarming trend is the rate of change in readership
among two
younger age groups: the 18-24 group and the 25-34 group. Members
of these
two groups, especially the former, comprise the prime newspaper
readers
of tomorrow, when the 18-24 group will be between the ages of 38
and 44
in 2010. A 1990 Times Mirror survey, however, showed that only 24
percent
of those under 35 acknowledged reading yesterday's paper,
compared to 67
percent in 1965.3 Another survey showed that readership among the
18-24
group decreased in the past 20 years by a rate of 20 percent,
from 71 percent
in 1967 to 57 percent in 1987.4 If more members of this age group
do not
start reading newspapers by 2010, the decreases in readership
among that
era's prime newspaper reading group will be substantially more
than today.
The 18-24 and the 25-34 age groups are part of the baby-bust
cycle;
they comprise a smaller percentage of the population than those
older than
34 (the baby boomers).
Considering the decreases in readership among these groups and
the fact
that they comprise a smaller percentage of the population, the
forecast
for newspaper readership, and eventually circulation, does not
look promising.
In fact, the decreases in population coupled with the decrease in
readership
among these groups could plague newspaper readership -- and
circulation
-- in the first decade of the next century. These numbers present
a challenge
to newspapers to act now to attract and retain potential readers
in these
age groups.
If newspapers make an effort to reach these younger readers
now, there
is hope. Readership studies, although they conflict over the
exact age,
show that the newspaper reading habit is acquired before age 30.
2.2 Teenagers Today, Newspaper Readers TomorrowThe reading habits of today's youth are a key factor in trying
to determine
who future readers are likely to be.
Today's teenagers read the newspaper less than their teenage
counterparts
of a decade or two ago. Newspaper readership among teenagers
slipped in
the past decade from 45 percent to 41 percent.5 In "Why
Teenagers
Do Not Read All About It," Cathy J. Cobb-Walgren lists
several factors
that contribute to what she calls "adolescents' growing
apathy toward
the newspaper":
Each of these factors, and the potential for change within
each factor,
could alter future readership and the way newspapers will have to
respond.
Even though newspaper readership declined among teenagers during
the 1980s,
the trend may not continue if any of the five factors change.
Furthermore,
other factors yet undetermined, such as the emergence of a new
medium,
may influence the amount of time today's teenagers spend reading
newspapers
when they are in their 30s and 40s, in the year 2010.
2.3 Level of literacyAlthough literacy levels have generally been increasing in the
United
States through the century, many teachers complain that students'
interest
in reading has waned during the 1980s. If this is true,
newspapers can
expect to lose some readers. The trend, however, does not
necessarily translate
into a great loss of readers for newspapers in 2005 to 2010, as
many of
these people will probably read the paper for information about
their interests
or work-related matters. It means, however, that newspapers will
have to
adapt their content to accommodate these consumers by using more
visual
elements like informational graphics, charts and photographs. The
trend
will also force newspapers to publish stories that are easier to
read.
In addition, because of what E.D. Hirsch Jr. says in his book
Cultural
Literacy is a lack of cultural background information among
today's children,
newspaper writers might find themselves explaining cultural facts
that previously
went without explanation.
Even if teenagers emerge from high school as nonnewspaper
readers, they
may still become readers. One study, for example, showed that
newspaper
reading increases with age.6 Furthermore, studies conducted by
The St.
Louis Post-Dispatch showed that newspaper reading was a habit
developed
in the early 20s and before age 30.7 Another study concluded that
readership
peaks in the 30 to 50 age group.8
Another study, however, found that people older than 18 were
unlikely
to acquire the habit of reading the newspaper. This study, titled
"Confirming
the Newspaper Reading Habit" by Gerald C. Stone and Roger V.
Wetherington
Jr.9, concluded that the newspaper reading habit is formed in
adolescence
-- especially before 18 -- and is often determined by the reading
habits
of the child's parent. The more the parents read the newspaper,
the more
likely the child would pick up the habit, the study found.
Because household
penetration of newspapers has been declining and because the
structure
of the family has been changing, these results present problems
for future
newspaper readership.
Assuming that the newspaper reading habit is closely linked to
the in-home
reading habits of parents, the changes taking place in the
structure of
American families and the way parents spend their time are likely
to result
in a slight decline in newspaper readership by the year 2005.
2.4 Family Composition And Newspaper ReadershipHousehold composition has been changing, while household
penetration
by newspapers has been decreasing. This poses a dual problem for
the future
of newspapers: attracting readers and attracting advertisers.
The traditional structure of the American household -- a
family consisting
of mom, dad, and 2 kids -- has changed, figures from the 1990
U.S. Census
show.10
First, the Census reveals, there are fewer households headed
by married
couples and more non-conventional households of couples,
roommates and
others living together. The average number of people in each
household
also decreased, from 2.76 in 1980 to 2.59 in 1990.
Second, other statistics show, there is a "trend toward
multiple
wage earner families."11 More mothers are working full- or
part-time
jobs, which inevitably decreases the amount of time they spend in
the home.
If both parents are working, they will have less time to spend
reading
newspapers in the home.
Assuming that the newspaper habit is acquired from parents
during adolescence,
the erosion of the traditional family structure and the trend
toward both
parents working will provide youths with fewer opportunities to
pick up
the newspaper reading habit in the home, with the result being an
erosion
of future readership.
Furthermore, because "research date demonstrate that
potential
for newspaper subscription increases with numbers of adults in
households
and with the amount of time adults have available to dedicate to
reading,"12
the changes mentioned above are also likely to hurt newspaper
circulation
and household penetration in the future.
This effect will pose revenue problems for newspapers because
advertising
prices are tied to circulation and household penetration -- the
ratio of
circulation to households -- which has been decreasing since
about 1950.
***
In the context of the changes in the structure of the American
family,
one possible solution is for newspapers to try to get children
and teenagers
hooked on reading the paper while they are in school. If
newspapers can
strengthen their role as an educational tool in the classroom,
they may
find that they can attract young readers.
Although the study by Stone and Wetherington found that
"exposure
to the [Newspaper In Education] program made no difference in the
tendency
to have acquired a newspaper reading habit," it is
uncertain, as the
authors themselves acknowledge, whether the study actually
measured exposure
to the area's project.13 Two other studies, however, found that
Newspaper
in Education programs not only improved pupils' attitudes toward
newspapers,
but also increased the likelihood that they would develop the
newspaper
reading habit. The studies showed that the more intense the
presence of
the newspaper in the classroom, the more likely children would
respond
by reading the newspaper in the future.14
Therefore, if newspapers can increase their presence in the
classroom
to a daily one, they stand a good chance of cultivating a young
and dedicated
readership.
A second possible solution would be to expand the amount of
content
devoted to young readers. Some newspapers, in an attempt to
capture younger
readers, have already begun devoting a weekly page or section to
kids.
The Salem (Mass.) Evening News, for example, runs a weekly Kids'
Page containing
news of interest to children, stories written by children, and
occasional
games.
Another example: During the war in the Persian Gulf, The
Hartford Courant
published -- as did other major metropolitan newspapers -- a
special section
that attempted to explain the war to children in simple and clear
language.
New York Newsday announced recently that it would continue
publishing a
Student Briefing Page it started during the war in the Persian
Gulf even
though the war is over.15
The St. Louis Post-Dispatch has taken a different tack toward
attracting
younger readers: an advertising campaign. Aimed at readers in the
21 to
24 range, the campaign, ironically, is using TV and radio
commercials and
billboard advertising. The campaign is unusual, said the paper's
marketing
manager, because such advertising is usually targeted toward
readers over
35. The marketing manager said that the newspaper sees the 21-24
age group
as potential steady readers who could help sustain the
newspaper's circulation
into the next century.16
Television, although being used by the Post-Dispatch to
attract readers,
has been a force of decline among the young for newspapers.
Recognizing
that they must compete with television for young media users'
time, newspapers
have begun redesigning their image to make it more exciting, more
colorful,
and more visual.
2.5 Newspaper Image"The newspaper nonreader is everywhere. And nowhere are
the swelling
ranks more problematic to the future of the newspaper industry
than among
the teenage population,"17 Cobb-Walgren concluded in her
study of
teenage nonreaders after finding that newspaper image was one of
the factors
that led teenagers not to read newspapers. Her findings
reinforced earlier
research that showed teenagers and young adults of college age
think of
newspapers as a "traditional, middle-aged medium which
assumes a rather
insignificant place in the adolescent's life."
Regarding newspaper content, Cobb-Walgren's survey found the
following:
*Many teenagers thought newspapers editors do not consider
what teenagers
like to read.
*Many teenagers thought there are not enough articles
relevant to their
hobbies.
*Many teenagers wished newspapers were more like magazines in
size
and color.
*Many teenagers think newspapers are old-fashioned.
These findings provide a prescription for future newspaper
content if
papers are to gain young readers now and keep them in the future.
Although many remain set in their traditional ways, some
papers are
starting to address at least one of the above concerns: being
perceived
as old-fashioned. In the past decade, many newspapers have
redesigned their
pages, adding color, graphics and a modern look. That's a start.
But they
must go further. They need to determine what today's teenagers
want to
read and then put that information into the paper. If newspapers
do not
act now to get today's teenage readers hooked on reading the
paper, the
future for newspapers will be grim.
2.6 Decreases in Leisure TimeThe time Americans spend at leisure has been decreasing during
the past
two decades. "The number of weekly hours the average person
has available
for leisure fell from 26.2 in 1972 to 16.6 in 1987, according to
the Harris
Poll," Leo Bogart writes in Press and Public.18
If leisure time continues to decline, it will hamper newspaper
readership
in future.
2.7 Political Apathy and ReadershipThe current wave of political apathy in America could hurt
newspaper
readership if it continues.
Voter turnout hit a new low in the 1988 presidential election,
with
only about 51 of eligible voters going to the polls. If many
people continue
to be apathetic toward politics and, subsequently, news about
politics,
newspapers, long the political journals of record, will be hurt
-- unless
they change their emphasis from government and political news to
information
more relevant and entertaining to today's and tomorrow's readers.
2.8 The Readership ForecastNewspaper readership will continue to slip into the year 2010.
Potential
readers will be lost as changes taking place in the family
structure decrease
the number who would otherwise acquire the newspaper reading
habit, which
is learned mainly from parents in the home. Better educational
programs
incorporating newspapers and emphasizing reading, however, could
help reverse
this trend. Other readers will be lost because of their apathy
toward reading
the news and because of their preferences for other media,
especially television.
The remaining readers, however, are likely to be well-educated
and relatively
affluent -- prime target audiences for many advertisers. And if
newspapers
can deliver these readers to advertisers in a cost-effective and
efficient
manner, it is reasonable to believe that newspapers will continue
to prosper
well into the next century. That prosperity, however, is unlikely
to reach
the levels attained during newspapers' boom years of the past
several decades.
2.9 Alternate Readership Forecast: The RenaissanceReadership, rather than decline, could rise dramatically in
the first
decade of the next century if, for political and cultural
reasons, there
is a shift toward reading and a heightened interest in
international news
as today's college students grow into the prime newspaper reading
age group.
Part of the declines in daily and Sunday readership during the
1970s
and especially the '80s can be attributed to the spirit of the
times. Newspapers,
in the decade of conspicuous consumption, power and vanity, just
weren't
fashionable. Television, with all its glamour, dash and color,
was. In
the 1980s, American culture was in decline, bottoming out as
Miami Vice
reached the top of the television ratings and USA Today hit the
newsstands
in 1982. Literacy in education and the movement away from reading
and analyzing
the classics hit what many educators saw as an all time low,
perhaps best
captured by the title of Allan Bloom's book The Closing of the
American
Mind.19 The period also prompted such cultural self-help books as
Hirsch's
Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know20 and A
Dictionary
of Cultural Literacy.
But culture, like the economy, is subject to cyclical swings.
Already
on American campuses, there is a trend toward multicultural
education.
If today's college students graduate with an embedded appetite
for information
and news about other cultures, it could renew interest in
newspapers, which
can deliver a variety of in-depth international news and
information better
on a daily basis than any other medium. This trend would in turn
not only
boost the future readership of newspapers but also attract
advertisers
to newspapers' new, educated and most likely affluent readers.
Further: As advances in communication and transportation make
the world
smaller, it is likely that newspapers will have the resources and
the means
to be a leading channel for collecting and disseminating
international
news.
Here's another way newspapers might be resurrected: Today's
students,
who are learning in part through using computers, may find
themselves interested
in getting information from electronic newspapers when they reach
adulthood
in the next century. The next section, Technology, will address
electronic
newspapers and the possibilities they hold for the future.
2.10 Another Possibility: The Mass-Media RebellionPeople, fed up with being inundated with information, rebel
against
the mass media and refuse to pay attention to the news.
"Information
anxiety," as Lorraine Wang, a journalist at The Hartford
Courant,
recently called it, has begun to plague people, making them feel
that there
is too much information and not enough time.
If people rebel against the media and begin rejecting
newspapers, advertisers
would lose their audience base and stop placing ads in
newspapers, sending
publishers into bankruptcy.
Because of this threat, newspapers will have to play a
stronger role
in sorting through the abundance of available information by
weeding out
the unnecessary while including the compelling, the interesting,
and the
entertaining.
3 TECHNOLOGYTechnology, if used properly, will furnish a life raft that
will help
keep newspapers afloat in the 21st century. Advances in
technology will
enable newspapers to assemble, print, and distribute their
traditional
papers more cheaply, allowing them to keep their advertising
prices low
while more easily targeting specific audiences. Personal-computer
based
pagination systems will give editors, writers and advertising
representatives
the tools to produce every page of the newspaper
electronically, eliminating
the traditional -- and costly -- composing process.
Advances in technology and changes in the channels through
which consumers
demand and receive information will lead newspapers to respond
with information
services that, although related, are beyond the traditional scope
of newspapers.
These forms of diversification, such as information service
telephone lines,
facsimile newspapers, electronic newspapers and data base
services, have
already begun to appear and can be expected to expand in the 21st
century.
3.1 Personal Computers and PaginationPersonal computer-pagination systems will continue to
radically simplify
the composing process of newspapers, bringing huge savings in
labor costs.
With systems already in place at several smaller newspapers, full
pagination
-- the computer assembly of all pages and all page components --
is scheduled
to be put into place at The Baltimore Sun this decade, making it
the first
major metropolitan daily to install such a system.
The full pagination of the future will enable newspapers to
forego several
steps in the composition of newspapers. Editors, reporters,
graphic artists,
photographers and advertising compositors will all use the same
computer-based
system to produce the newspapers. A page of the newspaper would
come out
of the typesetter in finished form, ready to be sent to
pre-press. Editors
will lay out the pages on the same computer that reporters use to
file
their stories, and the editors will simply import these stories
electronically
into their computerized page formats, much like is done now with
such programs
as Aldus PageMaker.
The technology already exists for full pagination, but because
of the
costs of revamping their computer systems, most newspapers are
still not
using the same computer system for graphics, pagination, editing,
writing
and ad makeup. As newspapers current computer systems become
obsolete and
as the price of full-pagination systems comes down, more
newspapers will
retool their operations with these advanced systems.
In addition to allowing newspapers to streamline their
editorial and
advertising operations, full pagination will enable them to amass
huge
amounts of information and distribute that information in a
greater variety
of ways: by the traditional printed newspaper, by telephone, by
fax, or
by telephone computer; by computer; by computer ROM disks; and by
others
ways yet to emerge.
3.2 The Talking NewspaperAt present, some newspapers are operating voice information
services
over the telephone to protect their market position, to make
money, and
to serve their readers better. Newspapers are likely to expand
these operations
in the future to reach nonreaders and to continue to provide
better services
to readers who want up-to-date news and information.
Michael R. Smith, an assistant professor of mass communication
at Lycoming
College in Williamsport, Pa., says that the market for voice
information
services, or audiotext, "is the most promising area for
newspapers
to add revenue, serve readers and enhance a market
position."21 Smith
notes that the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, concerned about the
erosion
of its advertising market share, started an audiotext service for
survival.
Smith quotes the Journal-Constitution's general manager of
voice information
services, Chris Jennewein, as saying that even though the voice
services
are not particularly profitable, they have "helped maintain
and improve
readership." The reason that the voice services improve
readership
is that they allow readers to interact with the newspaper and
that they
hold appeal for nonnewspaper readers and potential readers.
In terms of solving future readership problems, voice services
may help.
"Declining newspaper readership makes interactive electronic
media
all the more attractive as a way of attracting new readers,
including the
twenty-something crowd," Smith writes.
Voice services also provide an opportunity to increase ad and
sales
revenue. The Journal-Constitution provides much of its voice
information
services, ranging from sport scores to movie listings, for free.
Callers
must first listen to 15-second advertising message.
Voice services are attractive to advertisers because the
information
line, which is geared toward a specific interest, such as stocks,
gives
advertisers a direct link to specific target audience, such as
stock brokers.
Voice classified advertisements, especially personals ads and
help-wanted
ads, have become profitable for some newspapers. Newsday's
audiotext, for
example, grossed more than $2 million from three lines in 1990,
according
to Smith.
Thus, as voice services expand they are likely to not only
attract readers
to the newspaper, but also raise the newspapers revenues.
If telephone computers proliferate in American homes, the
newspaper
voice information services will follow in popularity. Such
services may
even be billed and paid for automatically. But the talking
newspapers will
primarily serve specialized interests and needs: sports fanatics,
stock
brokers, soap opera enthusiasts. People addicted to horoscopes.
Because
talking newspapers serve specialized needs, they will not become
more popular
than the newspaper, which has something for everyone.
Alternate forecast: U.S. District Court Judge Harold H. Greene repeals some or all
of the
restrictions on the regional Bell telephone companies, permitting
them
to move into generating and selling their own information over
the telephone.
With their vast telephone system and resources in place, the Bell
companies
would provide tough competition for newspapers in the voice
information
services market. The competition would either drive newspapers
out of the
voice information market or into operating agreements and
partnerships
with the Bell companies.
3.3 The Facsimile NewspaperAs faxes grow in popularity in American homes as well as
businesses,
fax papers may expand and become more profitable.
Although nine metropolitan newspapers, including The Hartford
Courant,
offer a fax paper, the sheets have yet to become popular. There
are several
reasons for this: the lack of fax machines in homes reduces the
number
of potential subscribers; most of the fax papers don't offer
enough services
beyond that of traditional newspapers while charging a higher
price; and
consumers are unaccustomed to the idea of receiving a paper by
fax.
In reacting to the slowness with which fax papers have caught
on, several
newspapers that started fax papers have canceled them. The Star
Tribune,
for example, started a fax paper in February 1990, but later
discontinued
the product. The Chicago Tribune also started a fax paper in 1990
but stopped
it after about four months. Although still being published, the
Courant's
fax paper, billed as an executive digest, has not become
profitable --
yet. It is breaking even.
But if faxes, or smart phones with a built-in fax, find there
way into
American homes and cars as well as businesses, the fax paper may
gain greater
appeal to a specialized audience: businesspeople. Fax papers
would be a
convenient and easy way for busy businesspeople to get quick
information
on, for example, stocks and bonds. If faxes become as popular in
cars as
cellular phones, fax papers may be read by drivers stuck in
traffic. Never
mind competition from radio: a fax paper would provide
businesspeople with
a hard copy that could be used for reference. In order to be
successful,
however, fax papers will have to offer information beyond that
carried
in the morning or afternoon's newspaper. Fax papers, to attract
readers,
will have to fill a niche now unfulfilled, and that niche is
tailored,
up-to-date information about financial markets.
In March, the St. Paul (Minn.) Pioneer Press launched a
personalized
fax paper that allows subscribers to select as many as 15 stock
prices
to be included in the reader's daily fax paper. But fax papers
must go
beyond being personalized. They must provide information updated
as often
as possible.
If fax papers can fulfill these needs, it is possible, even
likely,
that they will increase in popularity. And maybe even turn a
profit for
the newspapers that produce them.
Another problem with fax papers is that people are not used to
receiving
news by fax. This is likely to change, however, as faxes become
more popular
and people become more accustomed to using them.
***
Looking further into the future, advances in telecommunication
and computer
technology along with consumers' new preferences for receiving
information
could transform the fax papers of today -- usually a one-page
print out
of basic information -- into the newspapers of tomorrow. This
transformation,
however, pertains more to the information's transmission than to
its content.
Several changes likely to take place in telecommunication
technology
in the next 10 to 30 years could revolutionize the way newspapers
are distributed.
These advances in telecommunications -- the proliferation of
computerized
telephones with built-in faxes and laser printers and the
nationwide installation
of fiber optic cable -- could permit publishers to deliver
newspapers electronically
by fiber optic cable, the quality and capacity of which is far
greater
than today's copper wires and coaxial cables.
After being sent over broadband cable and received in the home
by a
computerized telephone, the newspaper would be printed by a laser
printer
attached to the computerized telephone.
Such a distribution method, assuming it becomes
technologically possible,
would reduce the high costs of newspaper home delivery -- loading
the papers
into gas-hogging and expensive trucks that transport them to
paper carriers
and homes all over the metropolitan area.22
If Arthur D. Little, a consulting firm in Cambridge, Mass.,
can imagine
"an American in which improved telecommunications replaced
10 to 20
percent of the miles now logged by commuters, shoppers and
business travelers,"
then it is only a small jump to envision the same opportunities
for businesses
that distribute information by car, truck, rail or plane.
"Communications
is bound to be a plausible alternative for getting from here to
there,"
says Peter Passell of the New York Times.23 Communications will
be a plausible
alternative for getting newspapers from here to there, too.
Computerized telephones would not be used only for home
distribution
of newspapers. On the contrary, such technology, which would be
costly
at first, would probably be brought to the market by the
telephone companies,
which would rent the phones to consumers and businesses. If the
price later
falls to an affordable level, more businesses and households
would buy
the devices. Fiber optic cable would probably be installed by
telephone
companies or cable companies or both.
If such technology develops and becomes popular in homes,
newspapers
must be innovative in adapting to it, using it to improve their
efficiency
and to lower their distribution and printing costs. The potential
savings
that newspapers could incur by distributing papers electronically
would
enable them to keep advertising prices competitive with the ad
prices of
other media.
Recent history affirms the possibility of such devices in the
future.
Facsimiles, for example, exploded in popularity during the 1980s,
with
corporate offices and other businesses rushing to buy and use
them. The
declining price of facsimiles helped fuel this boom. But
facsimile machines
are only one component of a "wired society" that Brody,
in his
book Communication Tomorrow, says is quickly becoming the
norm:
Enhanced telephone, facsimile, and electronic mail systems are moving rapidly toward the "wired society" of which futurists have been speaking and writing for more than a decade. Systems that will bind these seemingly separate networks into a cohesive whole already are in place or under development. Connected to computers and satellites, they will become the veins and arteries of the age of information. Newspaper delivery, then, may become a form of electronic mail
-- but
with a twist: Readers will print it out at home on their
computerized facsimiles
or the printers hooked to their smart phones.
***
All this underscores a more general point about the future of
newspapers.
To continue to survive and prosper, they will have to be
innovative in
responding to changes in the market and their audience in at
least two
ways: specialization and diversification.
Although, as Brody points out, it is uncertain "to what
extent
do newer, more selective media drive out older, more
mass-oriented media,"25
such as newspapers, it is certain that newspapers will need to
respond
with innovation to the changes coming with the "wired
society"
if they are to survive and prosper.
"New technology will bring newspapers either a serious
erosion
of readership and revenues -- or an explosion of new
opportunities -- according
to how well it is managed," John Diebold, president of The
Diebold
Group, told the American Society of Newspaper Editors in 1988.26
3.4 The Telecommunication-Newspaper ForecastAfter personal computers and laser printers or smart
telephones and
facsimiles find their way into more homes, newspapers will be
sent to these
computers by modem and then printed out on cheap recycled
computer paper
in the form of a traditional newspaper, with stories, editorials,
comics,
ads and all, although the size of the paper may be smaller. Much
of the
newspaper's content, including advertising, will be tailored to
the reader's
interests, eliminating waste and clutter. The cost of such a
newspaper
would be borne by advertisers, which could use the paper to reach
their
target audience, and readers, who would pay a small subscription
fee. The
probability of this forecast rests on the nationwide installation
of fiber
optic cable and computerized telephones.
3.5 The Electronic NewspaperThe first wave of electronic newspapers, initially heralded as
the future,
failed because they were too cumbersome, too complicated, too
slow and
too expensive. They also failed because consumers did not buy
personal
computers, let alone modems, for their homes as quickly as many
predicted.
At present, only 6 percent of American homes have modems. And
only about
1 percent of the country's population is using electronic
newspapers or
databases.27
Electronic newspapers, however, will have a second coming.
But, like
voice information services, they will serve specialized
informational needs
rather than the needs of the general reader. With this in mind,
it is safe
to assume that contrary to traditional newspapers, much of
electronic newspapers'
cost will be borne not by advertisers but by users, which means
they may
cost more. It also means they will be used less than traditional
newspapers.
On the other hand, advertisers may find electronic newspapers
a useful
avenue for reaching specialized interests, such as financial
consultants,
business travelers, and so on. Electronic newspapers will give
these readers
access to a greater amount of in-depth information than found in
the daily
newspaper, whether it be a suburban daily or The Wall Street
Journal. Moreover,
electronic newspapers would be particularly useful for monitoring
or searching
for information on a specific subject. All the user would have to
do is
plug in a key word and hit the search command.
The rebirth of electronic newspapers will be fueled by
advances in technology
that will make them easier to use. The nationwide installation of
a fiber
optic broadband network will allow electronic newspapers to be
transmitted
quickly and easily, with little if any wait to load up the paper.
The coming introduction of smart phones into the market will
also serve
as a catalyst for electronic newspapers, especially if smart
phones eventually
come with a built-in modem. With the turn of a switch, consumers
could
change their telephones into modems and connect them to their
personal
computers.
Without more personal computers in homes, however, electronic
newspapers
will not achieve popularity or profitability. Personal computers
will not
become popular in homes until their price drops and people feel
comfortable
using them. In 20 years, when computers are likely to be much
cheaper than
today, it is possible that each American home will have one, just
as each
home now has a microwave oven.
The widespread use of computers in education today will mean
that in
the future, more people will be comfortable using computers.
Today's grade-school
students, who are increasingly being taught with the aid of
computers,
will be the computer users of tomorrow. When these pupils become
adults
in a few decades, they will have a predisposition toward using
computers
to obtain news and information.
Other technology further enhances the likelihood that
electronic newspapers
will eventually boom. The Associated Press can already send color
photographs
to member newspapers' computer systems, which can view and edit
the photographs
in color on a screen. In the future, electronic newspaper
subscribers will
be able to look at color photographs on their home computer
screens. High-definition
television has the potential to revolutionize electronic
newspapers. Consumers
would hook their computer terminal to an HDTV screen to receive a
perfect
picture. As the picture would be so clear and the type could be
made almost
any size, the applications of HDTV with computer newspapers could
be particularly
helpful for people with impaired vision.
***
Electronic newspapers do not pose a threat to traditional
newspapers.
Regardless of how high-tech or easy to use electronic newspapers
become,
they will never supplant traditional newspapers. One of the great
strengths
of newspapers, and a reason they have been around so long, is
that they
can be used just about anywhere. They're portable. A person can
buy a paper
at a sidewalk vendor, stick it in his back pocket until he finds
a park
bench, and then whip it out and read it. It can be read on the
bus or on
the subway. While eating breakfast at a diner. Sometimes, people
even read
the newspaper while driving.
Another great strength of traditional newspapers is their
price. Electronic
newspapers, on the other hand, are and will continue to be more
costly
than regular newspapers (although their price is likely to
decrease over
time).
The price of electronic newspapers, including the modem or
smart phone
to receive them, the knowledge to use them, and the hardware and
software
to use them, makes them an elitist product and bars poor or less
computer
literate people from using them. For this reason they may never
appeal
to a mass audience.
3.6 Electronic Data BasesAs time passes, more and more newspapers and wire services
will move
into the business of providing electronic data base and library
services.
Their dominant position as news gatherers and information
dispensers gives
them the ability to enter this field with a minimum of cost or
resources.
Knight-Ridder, which owns many newspapers, is leading this
trend with
Dialog. Another leader is Dow Jones, the publisher of The Wall
Street Journal,
with its Dow Jones News/Retrieval service, which provides
financial information.
Both electronic newspapers and data base services will be used
in the
future, but the use will be confined to fulfilling such
specialized entertainment
or informational needs as horoscope updates and financial news.
In this way, newspapers can be expected to begin providing
cross-word
puzzle networks, computerized dating networks, and sports
information data
bases with current scores. Business and financial news networks
hold the
most promise. But again, such services and networks will not be
profitable
until personal computers find their way into more homes and more
people
become accustomed to using them. It is possible that by 2010,
these networks
will still not be popular or profitable. Nevertheless, given
certain technological
advances and changes in attitudes, they will eventually catch on.
3.7 Other TechnologyAdvances in other technology will also affect the future of
newspapers:
The environmental reporter for The Hartford Courant, Dan
Jones, said
that at present, there are only a few deinking plants in the
United States.
But more are being built. Jones said he expects there will 15 or
more such
plants by the end of this decade.
Advances in deinking and recycling technology will be
significant to
the future of newspapers for two reasons:
In the future newsprint will be deinked and reused several
times until
the level of fiber drops to an unusable level, then the newsprint
will
again be deinked, but this time the paper will be fed to cows. An
article
in Editor & Publisher cites a scientist at the University of
Illinois
College of Agriculture who says a new technique to transform old
newspaper
into feed for beef cattle is showing promise. The scientist,
Larry Berger,
says tests indicate newsprint can be turned into feed that would
account
for as much as 30 percent to 40 percent of a cow's diet. The
treated newsprint
could be cheaper than hay, he says. Although scientists
experimented with
feeding newsprint to cows in the '70s, they failed because the
cows could
not digest it. Berger says he has found a way to make the
newsprint more
digestible.28
Although newspapers will be printed on recycled paper, the
paper quality
will be as good as it is today, if not better, and the
reproduction quality
of graphics, photographs and print will far exceed today's
standards. This
is because advances in recycling and printing technology will
more than
offset loses in reproduction quality from using recycled
newsprint.
4 CONTENTTraditional daily newspapers will alter their content to
retain readers
in the future. Changes in reading habits, the amount of time
people spend
reading, and competition from other media will force newspapers
to adapt
if they are to survive and prosper into the year 2010.
4.1 Newspaper DesignThe following changes in the design of traditional newspaper
can be
expected as papers respond to their changing audience:
4.2 Editorial ContentThe following changes in the editorial content of traditional
newspapers
can be expected as they respond to the changing preferences and
informational
needs of their audience.
*Longer, rather than shorter, stories, especially about the
important
news events. In-depth coverage of relevant news will be the
salvation of
newspapers as more readers look to newspapers for the information
that
makes sense of an rapidly changing world. Although the use of
longer articles
seems contradictory given that people's leisure time is
declining, it nevertheless
makes sense. Readers, with less time to spend gathering
information, will
want to read quality, in-depth information about important news
events.
Readers will spend more time with what is important to them and
less time
with information that holds little or no value for them.
The editor in chief of Vanity Fair magazine, speaking May 7 to
the American
Newspaper Publishers Association, told the publishers that to
boost their
circulation, they must run longer, more substantial stories. The
editor,
Tina Brown, said readers will read longer stories if they are
seduced by
strong photographs and headlines and good writing emphasizing
human interest.
Brown added that Vanity Fair's circulation improved after the
magazine
started publishing more longer stories.30
As a guide to the longer stories inside the paper, newspapers
will increase
their use of news digests that present the news story's gist and
its location
inside the paper.
*More articles that analyze news events. As television, radio
or other
media provide better and better coverage of breaking news,
newspapers will
increasingly turn to putting the news in perspective rather than
reporting
it as though no one has heard about it, as many papers are doing
today.
*Newspapers, seeking to become more entertaining and
interesting to
readers, will publish more stories written in the narrative form,
rather
than the traditional style of presenting the facts in a
straight-forward
manner. This trend will give newspapers more of an emotional
charge and
human touch, making them appealing to readers in the way that
fiction now
is. As a result of this trend, the use of the first person will
also become
accepted and popular.
*Heightened emphasis on "gatekeeping." In the
information
age of the future, the notion of gatekeeping -- weeding out
irrelevant
information in favor of pertinent information -- will become ever
more
important in newspaper editing. If editors can fulfill their
roles as informational
gatekeepers, people will be more inclined to turn to newspapers
for the
information they need.
*Continuing a trend being established today, newspapers will
look for
new and better ways to serve their readers. Newspapers will
change their
emphasis from covering politics to covering issues of more
importance to
the lifestyles of tomorrow's readers. As coverage of child care
takes priority
over coverage of city hall, the distinction between hard news and
soft
news will blur.
*Zoning. More newspapers will publish zoned sections devoted
to covering
local news. These zoned editions will also carry advertising
directed at
people who live in specific regions or towns within the
newspaper's circulation
area. Both the ads and the news in the zoned sections will be
tailored
to the zone resident's preferences, as determined by occupation,
average
income, educational level, and other factors.
*Newspapers, seeking to serve advertisers better, will start
putting
some ads on the front page, as is done at some British papers.
Furthermore,
like the line between hard news and soft news, the line between
editorial
content and advertising content will blur.
*Newspapers will become increasingly specialized in their
editorial
content. They will print more news about cars and commuting, the
environment,
technology and science than ever before. Special sections,
published daily,
weekly or monthly, will cover specialized topics. This trend has
begun;
The Los Angeles Times, for example, began publishing a weekly
section focusing
on international news in 1990. Expect some newspapers to start
publishing
a weekly environmental section in the future.
*Specialized daily newspapers, such as The National, a
nationwide-circulation
sports daily, will grow in popularity as consumers' interests
narrow in
scope and audience fragmentation continues. It is possible, for
instance,
that The New York Times could launch a national daily newspaper
that contains
only international news.
5 OTHER FORMS, OTHER FORMATSNewspaper companies will continue to diversify their holdings
by moving
into other media as the year 2010 approaches.
Many major daily newspapers will likely either begin broadcast
news
television channels, like The Christian Science Monitor did a few
years
ago, or merge their operations with a broadcast news or radio
station or
both to form a single news outlet.
The Los Angeles Times launched a Sunday cable television show
last year,
and New York Newsday started a cable news channel on Long Island
a few
years earlier. It is conceivable that The New York Times, with
its established
news gathering network and advertiser base, will start a national
or international
cable television news station similar to the Cable News Network,
especially
if one of the three major networks folds its news operation,
opening a
niche for another major broadcast news network.
5.1 Multimedia NewsAfter more broadcast news networks and newspapers merge and
after fiber
optic cable is installed nationwide, news could be delivered in
ways radically
different from today.
The content of the newspaper would be combined with the
content of a
network news program and delivered to the home by fiber optic
cable. The
news would be sent hourly and stored in the viewer's computerized
HDTV
media center. Once stored in the media center, the news could be
presented
at the viewer's convenience in multimedia form. Text,
photographs, graphics
and charts would be combined with voice and video. And because
such a large
volume of information could be sent over fiber optic cable, there
would
be an array of in-depth news available to the viewer, who could
choose
what and how much to read.
6 CONCLUSIONThrough specializing, diversifying and changing content to
meet the
needs of tomorrow's audience, newspapers will remain a strong
medium, although
they are likely to continue to lose some readers. As readership
declines,
however, newspapers are likely to respond with changes in design
and content
that will gain new readers and retain many existing ones.
Attempts to increase
their appeal to today's younger readers -- the prime readers of
tomorrow
-- would help ensure newspapers' survival. But if newspapers fail
to respond
appropriately to changes in their audience, the future of
newspapers will
be grim.
Advances in technology will provide newspapers with ways to
streamline
their operations, reduce costs and diversify the ways they
distribute information.
By helping to cut costs, technological advances will also allow
newspapers
to keep their advertising prices competitive with other media.
Finally,
technological progress will lead newspapers into such new ways of
delivering
the news as multimedia news packages.
7 NOTES1. According to the second edition of Press and
Public
by Leo Bogart. Pages 81 and 82.
2. Press and Public, by Leo Bogart. Second Edition, 1989. Page
81.
3. "When Readers Design The News," by Carl Sessions
Stepp, in
the April 1990 issue of the Washington Journalism Review. Page
22.
4. These statistics are from surveys taken by Simmons Market
Research Bureau,
as cited by Bogart on Pages 80 and 81 of Press and Public.
5.
"Why
Teenagers Do Not Read All About It" by Cathy J.
Cobb-Walgren. Journalism
Quarterly, Vol. 67, No. 2 (Summer 1990), Pages 340-347.
6. Wilbur Schramm, Jack Lyle and Edwin B. Parker, "Patterns
in Children's
Reading of Newspapers." Journalism Quarterly, Vol. 50 (1973)
Pages
543-548.
7. "Reaching Young Adults via Broadcast," in the March
16, 1991,
issue of Editor & Publisher. Page 25.
8. Wilbur Schramm and David M. White, "Age, Education,
Economic Status:
Factors in Newspaper Reading," Journalism Quarterly, Vol.
26. Pages
149-159. (1949)
9. Journalism Quarterly, Autumn 1979, Pages
554-562.
10. "Census reveals changes in state: Households shown less
traditional,"
in the April 24, 1991, issue of The Hartford Courant. Page D1.
11. Brody, Page 71.
12. Brody, Page 113.
13. "Confirming the Newspaper Reading
Habit,"
Journalism Quarterly, Autumn 1979. Page 558.
14. Press and Public, by Bogart. Pages 129-130.
15. "Newsday's student briefing page to continue,"
Editor &
Publisher, April 13, 1991. Page 18.
16. "Reaching Young Adults via Broadcast," in the March
16, 1991,
issue of Editor & Publisher. Page 25.
17. Page 347.
18. Page 27.
19. Published in New York by Simon and Schuster in 1987.
20. The Houghton Mifflin Company published Hirsch's book in
1987.
21. "New
Age Journalism: Deadline-free news and information services
arrive,"
in the Jan. 26, 1991, issue of Editor & Publisher. Page 2TC.
22. Benefits from the electronic home distribution of newspapers
would
also be social; it would reduce traffic congestion, road wear and
pollution.
Traditional methods of distribution, however, would probably
still be needed
for such outlets as sidewalk vendors, newsstands, stores and
other sellers.
23. The Faxes Are Coming, by Peter Passell, in the Wednesday,
April 10,
1991, edition of The New York Times. Page D2.
24. Page 191.
25. Page 192.
26. As quoted by Brody on Page 215 of Communication Tomorrow.
27. "New Age Journalism: Deadline-free news and information
services
arrive," by Michael R. Smith, in the Jan. 26, 1991, issue of
Editor
& Publisher. Page 23TC.
28. "Fit to eat?: Animal scientist says cows could feed on
treated
newspapers," Editor & Publisher, March 2, 1991. Page 7.
29. Journalism Quarterly, Vol. 67, No. 2 (Summer 1990), Pages
340-347.
30. From an Associated Press story by Dan Day that the wire
service published
May 7 from Vancouver, British Columbia.
8 RELATED
Did Weber believe that, even though
facts are one thing and values another,
social and economic facts could be
evaluated without the analysis being
influenced by values? And what is the
relation of objectivity to values? Could
objectivity, for instance, be used to
show that one value is superior to
another? Or does objectivity apply only
to the analysis of facts? Do one's
values or perspective stem from human
nature, metaphysical views, personal
identity, or is it just as likely that
they are a mere construct of culture?
|
|
Copyright © 1996-2006 Steve Hoenisch and Criticism.Com. All rights reserved. | Home | Site Map | Search | Privacy Policy | Top |